Skip to main content

March 10, 1918 - Don Martin arrives in Paris to cover the American Expeditionary Force

Don Martin diary entry for Sunday, March 10, 1918: 
Arrived in Paris 10 p.m./
Here I am in Paris after a very tiresome but interesting day. Arrived at Havre at 7 a.m. but heavy fog necessitated staying at anchor till 10 when we came in. Calm all the way over. I lay down for few hours but kept my clothes on. Long unpleasant wait to get passports vised and baggage passed at Havre. Had lunch at famous Tantoni’s with couple Englishmen, one of them decent. Went for long walk all over the city.  


Started for Paris at 5:19. Had no trouble with baggage. Slept most of the way to Paris. Met fine young aviator named Hodges of Albany, Ga., on the train and brought him with me in a taxi to the Crillon Hotel. Probably won’t see him again. Bennett picked out a good hotel for me. Went to Herald office and met staff. Burn Price and I then went for an hours walk up one side of Seine and down the other. Back to hotel at 1 a.m. ready for bed!
Weather ideal.
       Arriving in Paris for the first time, after two months in London, Don Martin was immediately taken by the city, calling it the “wonder city of the world.” The Commodore, James Gordon Bennett, had put him up at The Crillon, just about Paris’s best hotel. And eating there and at Prunier led him to exclaim ‘the London people ‘feed’, here they feast’. In the fourth year of war and not far from the front line, he still found ‘steak and a dozen oysters’.  His diary entries portray a first week spent sightseeing, while angling with success to get closer to the front. He also had time for letter writing – perhaps reflecting his newspaperman’s necessity to put words on paper everyday.
      The Hotel Crillon is located on the Place de la Concorde, facing the River Seine and next to the U.S. Embassy. Here are photos from October 2017. The Crillon was recently purchased by a Saudi Arabian and a complete internal refurbishing had just been completed. 
Hotel Crillon, Paris, October 2017
Hotel Crillon entrance
Hotel Crillon on Place de la Concorde





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more