Skip to main content

March 18, 1918 - Don Martin arrives at Headquarters in Neufchateau

  MARCH 18–MAY 12, 1918. Don Martin Gets into the War
     Two-and-a half months into his assignment in Europe, Don Martin was to witness – and report on as a visiting correspondent – the war, still from a little distance away. Experiencing real war began to harden Don Martin’s thoughts and feelings about the Great War, and America’s role in it.  It took until mid-May for Don Martin to receive accreditation as a 'war correspondent', so that he could go wherever he wished on the front lines
 
Don Martin diary entry for Monday, March 18, 1918: 
Arrived in Neufchateau.
Some day! Left Paris at 8 this morning after exciting trip, or vexatious trip to station. The French are artistic but for providing conveniences they are antiquated. Rode on train 6 hours to get here. Had good meals on train and was met in Gondrecourt in government auto, which brought me here – about 20 miles. Am spending the night at Neufchateau, the American base headquarters. Have room in funny little hotel.
Am on the very edge of the war zone. Met Martin Green [New York Evening World], [Mel] Draper [New York Tribune], [Floyd] Gibbons [Chicago Tribune], Orr [International News], [Wilbur] Forest [United Press], [Sam] Johnson, [Fred] Ferguson [United Press] and other correspondents. Had dinner with some of them at the officer’s club and spent the evening later there. Put on my uniform for the 1st time. Breeches are too tight. Neufchateau a picturesque place. War corresponding not what it once was. Censor is so strict it is almost impossible to send anything. To get the news one must cover about 200 miles a day in an auto. Is a big job. I got a gas mask and steel helmet tonight for trip to front tomorrow.
Am writing this by candlelight.

Weather pleasant.
       Don Martin was headquartered during this March - June period with the fifteen accredited correspondents [Chris Dubbs, American Journalists in the Great War, p. 210] in the town of Neufchateau, a middle-sized town 200 miles (321 km) east from Paris and south of the war front.The map on this page taken from "American Armies and Battlefields in Europe, The Blue Book" [American Battlefield Monuments Commission] shows Divisional training areas of the AEF in France and the location of Neufchateau in area 2.

     During this period in Neufchateau, Don Martin went to Paris four times. He recorded his experiences in his 1918 diary and began to send daily dispatches from the war areas, which were featured in The New York Herald and in syndicated newspapers across America. These began to establish Don Martin as a leading U.S. war correspondent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...