Skip to main content

March 30, 1918 - Don Martin has good talk with General Pershing, and sees Secretary of War Baker

Don Martin diary entry for Saturday, March 30, 1918: 
Went to Chaumont and saw [Newton] Baker, Secretary of War, and General Pershing. Had quite a talk with Pershing, but he wouldn’t release it for publication. Hung around Chaumont for 4 hours with Junius Wood [Chicago Daily News] and [Edwin] James [New York Times]. Baker seems a weak person to be head of our war department. Doesn’t know what is going on. Pershing is a “line one.” He apparently knows situation on the front is serious. Says the 1st division of our army will start for the real front on Wednesday. I wired Mr. Bennett to make request for me to go with it.
The more I see here the more I realize how infinitesimal our part in the war is and how different the present story might be if Wilson had gone into the war, as he should have done, when the Lusitania sank. All our soldiers in France wouldn’t last an hour in the furnace north and east of Paris. Meantime Germans are starting new attack.

Weather rainy and cold.
        Don Martin hand wrote a letter to Dorothy on March 30 from Neufchateau. It was his first report on what he was experiencing from Neufchateau since the German offensive got under way.
Dorothy:
I’m not writing as frequently as I did. There are two reasons: I am frequently off in queer little places where it is impossible to write and here in the town where I am staying most of the time – it is near Alsace – the room is so cold and the light so poor (as it is now, by the way) that it is not easy to write.
Since your Dad left Paris he has been where there is a distinct war atmosphere. For instance right now, with the rain falling heavily, a steady stream of ponderous motor trucks is passing through here, right in front of the hotel. It seems as if everything is on the move, since the biggest battle of all started a week ago.
... I have seen a good deal of France in a couple of weeks. I ride from 100 to 200 miles a day in an automobile. Today I was at General Pershing’s Headquarters, which is a long way from the battlefront. I had quite a talk with him. I also saw Secretary Baker at a chateau nearby. Yesterday I was up at Verdun, of which you have read. I wasn’t where the shells were falling but could hear the bombarding which goes on incessantly. I have passed through dozens of towns which have been battered to pieces and have seen a little of everything, including a peep into the trenches...
(National Archives photo no. 111-SC-10935, Chaumont, Apri 17, 1918)
Just now everyone is worried over the German attack. I don’t think it can be successful but there is just a chance that it will be. If it fails the world will have to tip its hat to the French again. We – the Americans – do not count and the British seem to lack the genius and valor we all thought they still had. Still no one but the men actually in charge of operations know what is being done so maybe the Germans will be licked good as they ought to be.
I don’t know how long I shall stay here. I may go up to the big battle but again I may not. It is very difficult to get authorization. A hundred want it and only 6 can go. I fear I shall not be one of the lucky ones.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more