March 1, 1918 - Commodore Bennett wants a correspondent at the front

And then at the two-month mark in London, almost a go-ahead for France from the Commodore!

Don Martin diary entry for Friday, March 1, 1918:

Quite a busy day. Lingwood woke me at 9:30 to read a couple of telegrams from the Commodore – one to see Mr. Whitehead of the Whitehead Aircraft Co, which I did this afternoon – his factory is in Richmond – and another, more important (to me) either to recommend someone to go to the front unless I think it preferable to go myself – providing I can get some ”good” man to replace me while I’m away. Wired tonight I think it all right to go myself and to leave the London office as it is. Am anxious to know what the Commodore will say. Whitehead told me most interesting story how the Commodore lent him $1000 years ago at Monte Carlo when he, Whitehead, had lost everything. A good new story to put in the Commodore’s obituary, unless he lives forever. Worked at the office until midnight. Then to the hotel. Irving Cobb has left some things for me to keep till he gets back from the front.

Weather clear, windy + very cold.

Don Martin again hand-wrote a short letter to Dorothy, “just a line before I go to bed”, mostly reacting to her letter writing and doings.

Comments

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary. Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’ Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’. Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.? To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension. For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .” But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question. ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’ NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...

Search This Blog