Skip to main content

‘Snapback’ implemented, politics in the air

Iran International and the Tehran Times reported interesting new developments and statements bearing on the ‘snapback’ sanctions, U.S.-Iran relations, and Iran’s NPT adherence. Here are highlights: UNSC sanctions are being implemented, President Trump and Iranian leadership are on different planets, and, perhaps most intriguing, the possibility of Iran withdrawing NPT ratification but not its signature.
‘Snapback’ sanctions 
        The European Council is reinstating a wide range of restrictive measures against Iran: “Today, the Council agreed to reimpose a number of restrictive measures in relation to Iran's nuclear proliferation activities, that had been suspended with the entry into force of the [JCPOA] in 2015.” The restored measures include “both those adopted by the UN Security Council since 2006 with successive UNSC resolutions and automatically transposed into EU law, and EU autonomous measures.” 
        The sanctions target individuals and entities with travel bans and asset freezes, as well as prohibitions on making funds or economic resources available to them. “In addition to the arms export ban to Iran and the ban on transfer of any items, materials, goods and technology that could contribute to Iran’s enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ballistic missile programs, the measures also include bans on imports, purchase and transport of crude oil, natural gas, petrochemical and petroleum products and related services.” The sanctions extend to “the sale or supply of key equipment used in the energy sector, the sale or supply of gold, other precious metals and diamonds, certain naval equipment, [and] a ban on certain software.” Financial penalties include “the freezing of assets of the Central Bank of Iran and of major Iranian commercial banks.” “Measures are reinstated to prevent access to EU airports of Iranian cargo flights, and to prohibit the maintenance and service of Iranian cargo aircraft or vessels carrying prohibited materials or goods.” 
        UK, France and Germany in a joint statement urged Iran to "refrain from any escalatory actions and to resume compliance with its legally binding safeguards commitments." They also urged Iran and all other states to fully comply with UN resolutions. 
        US sanctions on a major Indian port project in Iran's Chabahar took effect on Monday. The port had previously been exempted from US sanctions to support regional development and trade routes to Afghanistan bypassing Pakistan. AFP reported that under US law, companies including state-run India Ports Global Limited will have 45 days to exit Chabahar or risk having any US-based assets frozen and US transactions barred. 
U.S.- Iran 
        On Monday President Donald Trump discussed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "Iran…" Trump said he hopes Iran will join Abraham Accords "I long ago said at one point Iran would be a member of the accords. And little did I realize it was going to take this turn. It was some turn we did with the B-2s." "I think they might very well be there, it would be a great thing for them economically."
        On Monday, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei unequivocally stated that negotiations with the United States are a "dead end" and would only bring harm to the nation. "The Americans have shown they cannot be trusted." 
        On Monday, Iran President Pezeshkian delivered his strongest public remarks accusing Western powers of hypocrisy and vowing that Iran would never accept humiliation. "They want to sanction us because we refuse to bow our heads. The dream of bringing Iran to its knees is nothing but an illusion." 
NPT 
        Iranian lawmaker, Hashem Khanafereh, said on Monday: “Withdrawing from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) has not been ruled out and is being considered as a legal and diplomatic tool.
        Former deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization Pezhman Shirmardi said on Monday withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) would not benefit Iran. “Perhaps it is better for us to maintain our commitment and goodwill today, unless the Islamic Republic’s interests dictate otherwise.” 
        Hossein Shariatmadari, a representative of Supreme Leader, wrote in Kayhan daily Monday that Iran’s parliament should withdraw ratification of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty while leaving the government’s signature intact, “With this step the Islamic Republic accepts the spirit of the treaty, meaning no nuclear weapons production, but rejects safeguard obligations and inspections.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...