Skip to main content

Plot Thickens on Damaged Iranian Sites

Perhaps IAEA inspectors are (or will be) walking around the outsides of the damaged sites of Fordow, Esfahan and Natanz. If so, it is a nice gesture of cooperation by Iran, while it won’t provide anything much regarding the status of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles. On that matter, today’s reports in the Israeli press are a bit conflicting. But they provide other useful information about what is going on and about the September 9 Cairo agreement between Iran and IAEA. Here are highlights. 
        The Jerusalem Post reported on Sept 11, 2025, based on reports by AFP, that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said during a television interview on September 11: “All of our material is under the rubble of the bombed facilities" and it has now become inaccessible. Araghchi added that the IAEA was currently examining the sites. 
        But The Times of Israel on Sept 12, 2025, reported that in the televised interview Thursday [September 11] Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi said ‘The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran was assessing the condition and accessibility of the material at the damaged sites in order to submit a report to the country’s Supreme National Security Council.’ ‘Araghchi further elaborated that the agreement distinguishes between nuclear facilities that were attacked during the war and others which were unharmed, such as the Bushehr reactor in the south. Access to undamaged facilities will be “considered case by case by the Supreme National Security Council.” For the targeted facilities “For now no action is taken until Iran carries out the necessary measures related to environmental and safety concerns.” 
        We recall that Stephanie Liechtenstein (AP) reported, back on September 4, that the latest IAEA Iran report states that, with regard to the damaged sites, Iran “undertook to provide the Agency with a report ‘up to one month after the finalization of this Arrangement [on September 9].” After the submission of such a report, Iran and the IAEA would negotiate a new arrangement for cooperation. 

        Was that enough to satisfy the E3 and the U.S. so they did not push through new action by the IAEA Board of Governors at this week’s meeting? The absence of reporting suggests that to be the case. Now comes the IAEA General Conference next week, another playground or battlefield in the Iran nuclear conundrum.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more