Skip to main content

January 2, 1918 - First taste of news gathering in London

     As Don Martin began his work reporting from London, he would have known that his competition was the Associated Press (AP). The New York Herald was publishing AP dispatches datelined London every day, usually more than one per day.  Yet he never mentioned an AP reporter in his diary. Months later in France, he does record when he refused to share an automobile with the AP reporter. 
Don Martin diary entry for Wednesday, January 2, 1918: 
Had my first taste of news gathering in London. With  Welliver saw Admiral Reginald Hall [Director of Naval Intelligence], Gen. Maurice [Director of Military Operations at the War Office] and a foreign office man. They talked quite frankly about the whole situation. It is evident the British expect some desperate fighting before the war ends. The submarine menace is much more serious than U.S. knows. Admiral Hall says a new scheme will largely overcome it however. Met Holmes formerly of NY Times, Wallace formerly of [Blyraw], and Tuohey of World at the Admiralty office. Business of gathering news just same in London, where the world’s future is in the balance, as in NY City during a city campaign. Took Champion to dinner at Simpson’s and wrote two mail stories.

Weather pretty fair
[At the New York Herald London Office on Fleet Street, Don Martin found Messrs. Champion and Baird and others not named in his diary (except little Jo, the office boy, to whom he would give a suit). He never mentioned their first names, although he expressed his opinion of them a number of times.] 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...