Skip to main content

January 18, 1918 - More stories about German submarines

Don Martin diary entry for Friday, January 18, 1918: 
Went to luncheon of American Luncheon Club with Russell. Then to office. Nothing much to do. Mr. Miller of United Press called for me and we went to dinner at Simpson’s. Went to office in the rain. At 12:30 at hotel met American sailors from S. I. [Nau Mark] who told me how they were fired at by submarine. Dictated cable and wrote story for Paris. War news quiet. Submarine sinkings low after 2 very bad weeks. Food situation here getting bad. Allies are worried about the threatened spring drive of Germany. Whole issue rests upon the submarines – whether the Allies can overcome it either by building enough new ships or destroying the subs. 
Weather sloppy but warm
    A story cabled to New York about a submarine attack, written on January 18,  was published in the New York Herald on Saturday, January 19, 1918.
American Line Steamship Attacked by Four U-Boats,   Her Guns Drive Them Off
Big Passenger Vessel Pursued by Squadron of Submarines—Shots are Fired at the Attackers and Hits Are Believed To Have Been Scored—Great Excitement Aboard
[Special Cable to the Herald via Commercial Cable Company’s System]
Herald Bureau, No. 130 Fleet Street, London, Friday
     An American line steamship reaching England to-day had a startling experience with submarines
     She almost overran one on a foggy night. This submarine and later submarines were seen on each side of the steamship.
     Shots were fired by the vessel’s guns and a fourth submarine was seen a few hours later, when more shots were fired from the steamship.
     It is believed that some of the shots scored a hit.
     Destroyers chased the submarines and great excitement constantly prevailed aboard the steamship while the U-boats were threatening her.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...

“Quit the nuclear deal”

The E3 (Britan, France, Germany) upped their ante with a letter to the UN Security Council on August 12, 2025, that included: ‘ if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism ’. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  So far, we have an Iranian response from Parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki — who was Iran’s top diplomat for five years in the 2000s — saying the Iranian parliament has a “ finger on the trigger ” for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. “ We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal, ” if the E3 raises the issue at the U.N. Security Council, Mottaki said. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  On ‘extension’, following July’s meeting in Istanbul [between E3 and Iran], an E3 diplomat said Iran could delay [snapback] by doing two things [1] renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and [2] addressing concerns about its highly enriche...