Skip to main content

JCPOA isn’t over, is it?

With the occurrence of Termination Day on October 18, 2025, there is the question of just what terminated. UNSC/RES/2231 is clear that the resolution terminates on Termination Day, and the item is removed from the Security Council agenda. That includes Annex B. Statement, whose provisions anyway applied only for 5 to 10 years from JCPOA Adoption Day, which is Termination Day. But what about Annex A. JCPOA? 
        My reading is that JCPOA has a life of its own and it is not terminated when RES/2231 terminates. But I may be wrong. A verdict by the legal team that produced JCPOA is needed. Here is my evaluation:
        Many JCPOA provisions include “for 15 years” (see list below) and a couple for 20 and 25 years. There is no start date or reference to a defined date, such as Implementation Day or Adoption Day. There are no provisions that mention “10 years”. And it is remarkable that RES/2231 has no mention of “15 years” (or 20 or 25 years). 
        JCPOA Annex V. Implementation Plan, has two relevant provisions: 
E. UNSCR Termination Day, paras 23 and 24 state that: provisions and measures imposed in RES/2231 would terminate “ten years after Adoption Day.” 
F. Other states that: The terminations in Annex V are without prejudice to other JCPOA commitments that would continue beyond such termination dates. 
        What else could F. mean than that JCPOA defines the application periods for its provisions, independently from RES/2231? And therefore, termination of RES/2231 applies only to UN Security Council consideration of this matter. And one can add, for the moment. Because it can be expected that the IAEA Board of Governors will be passing its finding(s) of Iran’s noncompliance with its NPT safeguards agreement to the Security Council, sooner or later. 

For the record, here is a listing of the “15 years” paragraphs referred to above. 
Annex A. JCPOA - Application periods for provisions 
“For 15 years” 
Operative Paragraphs 
A.5, A.7    Uranium enrichment long term plan 
C.15          IAEA speedy access 
Annex 1. 
E.18-26     No reprocessing and related 
F.28          Enrichment maximum 3.67% 
F.31          Enrichment only at Natanz 
F.40          Enrichment testing only at Natanz 
F.45          No enrichment at Fordow 
F.46          1044 IR-1 centrifuges maximum at Fordow 
F.50          Stable isotope production at Fordow 
J.56          Uranium stockpile maximum 300 kg @ 3.67% 
J.58          No conversion to UF6 
N.67          IAEA monitoring for JCPOA access 
P.71          IAEA access to Natanz 
P.72          Enrichment solely at Natanz 
P.73          Export of enrichment technology

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Quit the nuclear deal”

The E3 (Britan, France, Germany) upped their ante with a letter to the UN Security Council on August 12, 2025, that included: ‘ if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism ’. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  So far, we have an Iranian response from Parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki — who was Iran’s top diplomat for five years in the 2000s — saying the Iranian parliament has a “ finger on the trigger ” for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. “ We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal, ” if the E3 raises the issue at the U.N. Security Council, Mottaki said. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  On ‘extension’, following July’s meeting in Istanbul [between E3 and Iran], an E3 diplomat said Iran could delay [snapback] by doing two things [1] renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and [2] addressing concerns about its highly enriche...
Post a Comment
Read more