Skip to main content

Three weeks to 2025 IAEA General Conference

Hugh Chalmers of VERTIC wrote in the Bulleting of Atomic Scientists on August 12 about reestablishing IAEA safeguards in Iran after the June Israel/U.S. attacks. Two points are of particular interest. 
1. Chalmers properly raises the importance of the 2025 IAEA General Conference on September 15-19 at which the Iran issue will be a topic. He writes the following: 
        IAEA member states differ on the legality of the military strikes and the IAEA’s statutory role and mandate to respond to them. These differences may be put on display at the September [IAEA General] Conference. If they are, member states will need to agree on some language that reinforces existing prohibitions and restrictions in this regard whilst retaining buy-in from Washington. A clear expression of restraint from member states—including from the United States—at the general conference could go some way to reassuring Iran that it will not be punished for complying with its safeguards agreement. 
        Yes, it will be interesting to see how all that pans out. Let’s hope that we will see the Member State restraint that Chalmers calls for. 
2. Chalmers, in struggling with how Iran-IAEA relations can be brought back to normal, comes up with the following suggestion. 
Tehran could rebuild its relationship with the IAEA by inviting the agency to return to Iran outside the context of safeguards inspection. The two parties could discuss opportunities for IAEA assistance relating to any nuclear safety, nuclear security, and radiation-protection issues created by the strikes. This could involve or result in a “fact-finding” mission to the damaged sites—led by the IAEA director general… 
        Would that Middle East politics were so simple. Diplomat DG Grossi leading a technical tour of the bombed sites! Hugh Chalmers, Iran has banned Grossi from visiting Iran. 
        No, the big issue is Iran’s enriched nuclear material. If Iran reports significant quantities to IAEA, Israel and the U.S. can be expected to attack again - both Netanyahu and Trump enjoy spouting that with grinning faces. 
        That leads to looking back at Herbert Lin’s preliminary thoughts on the outcome of the U.S. strikes, in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists on June 23. Here are two of his points. 
1. Actual battle damage assessment will be difficult… Those outside Iran are unlikely to be given access to damaged facilities to see the results… Iranians won’t be letting anyone in to examine it. 
        Two months on, those predictions stand correct. 
2. If there is no regime change… future political or diplomatic arrangements with Iran on its nuclear program will be most unlikely. Without regime change, the US attack … is likely to be just the first of many such attacks in the future… 
        There is no regime change in sight. And Iranian officials talk of war with Israel restarting at any moment. Hopefully, someone will come up with a peaceful way forward. But it is hard to see one with Netanyahu ready to take on everyone, everywhere, and the E3 apparently determined to push Iran off the cliff to withdrawal from NPT.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Quit the nuclear deal”

The E3 (Britan, France, Germany) upped their ante with a letter to the UN Security Council on August 12, 2025, that included: ‘ if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism ’. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  So far, we have an Iranian response from Parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki — who was Iran’s top diplomat for five years in the 2000s — saying the Iranian parliament has a “ finger on the trigger ” for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. “ We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal, ” if the E3 raises the issue at the U.N. Security Council, Mottaki said. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  On ‘extension’, following July’s meeting in Istanbul [between E3 and Iran], an E3 diplomat said Iran could delay [snapback] by doing two things [1] renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and [2] addressing concerns about its highly enriche...
Post a Comment
Read more