Skip to main content

February 7, 1918 - Tuscania sinking strengthens American determination

      The sinking of the Tuscania was the center of attention on February 7 and 8. The coming losses of American lives in the Great War became a reality for the country. 
Don Martin diary entry for Thursday, February 7, 1918: 
Had a rather busy day. Did a lot of work in the office. Then went to Admiralty office to inquire about sinking of Tuscania, American transport. Had previously seen Irvin S. Cobb at the hotel. He was on Baltic in same convoy with Tuscania. Told me good story which I cabled quite fully to N.Y.  Also wrote story for Paris.  [Don Martin knew the eminent humorist and war reporter, Irvin Cobb, who wrote for the l2-million circulation Saturday Evening Post. Cobb had covered the war in 1914, including inside Germany, and had now returned to cover the AEF. Don Martin would maintain contact over the coming months.]
[SS Tuscania was a luxury liner of the Cunard Line subsidiary Anchor Line, named after Tuscany, Italy. She was torpedoed by the German U-boat UB-77 while transporting American troops to Europe and sank, sending 210 people to their death] 
Had dinner at Cheshire Cheese with Champion. Met Nuptal, Burke’s friend there. Went to office and then to bed. Got letter from Mother and enclosure from Dorothy.
All talk now is of threatened German offensive on which she will stake everything. Admiral Hall says submarine situation and food very serious.
Weather pleasant. Warm.

         Don Martin hand-wrote a short letter to his mother the evening of February 7, 1918, London, in which ending the war in late 1918—as happened—is mentioned.
Savoy Hotel
London, E. C. 4.
Mother:
       ... We don’t hear about sinkings right away. Today we heard of one which no doubt has caused excitement at home—the Tuscania. I got a good story about it from Irwin S. Cobb who was on XXXXXX which saw the submarine attack. It is pretty serious business. The submarines are very active and no ship is safe. .... 

      The food situation is not good at all here. The world shortage seems to center here because of the dearth of ships. A glass of good rich milk is never seen. Cream is not used at all and good butter and plenty of it belongs to a past age in England. Still everyone gets along. 

     There is no doubting that the world is tired of war and the feeling now seems to be that the war will end late this year after both sides have done everything possible to make sure of a good show when peace conferences begin. ...
                     With love, 
                                  Don


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more