Iran International reported on Feb 9 that Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said once again on Sunday, Feb 8: “Zero enrichment can never be accepted by us.” Put more precisely, Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday, Feb 8, that Tehran wanted its rights under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to be respected.
What are NPT States’ rights under NPT?
Michael Crowley, in the New York Times on Feb 6, 2026, presented the opinion of Gary Samore, Brandeis University, on the issue of Iran’s ‘right’ to enrich Uranium under the NPT:
“The question hinges on intentionality. If you believe their program is purely peaceful, then they have a legitimate claim to a right to enrich. If you think the Iranian enrichment program is just a cover to build up to a nuclear weapon option, then they don’t have that right.”
Crowley went on to write: ‘There is no authoritative arbiter for the question. The treaty does not have a body that would make such decisions.’ On that matter, Crowley has it wrong.
There is indeed an ‘authoritative arbiter’ in the NPT system, through the NPT Review Conferences, at which decisions can be taken on the implementation of the NPT treaty. That could include this uranium enrichment issue (and the related plutonium reprocessing issue). The U.S. as a member of the NPT, could work to have the issue of uranium enrichment under NPT addressed through it. Or, other NPT States could take the lead on addressing the more general matter of a nuclear threshold state under NPT.
Comments
Post a Comment