Skip to main content

September 16, 1918: Don Martin tours recaptured St.-Mihiel salient

Don Martin diary entry for Monday, September 16, 1918: 
Had interesting trip. Went to Essey; then to Nonsard and on through Heudicourt to Saint Mihiel. Talked to several persons who lived in villages during German occupation of four years. Saw German cemetery in Saint Mihiel – fully 6,000 Germans buried there. Monuments elaborate as anything in Europe. German efficiency has a counterpart in German effrontery. Americans here about cleaned out the salient. Germans never stopped to give a fight. Our casualties are very small, but we have about 20,000 prisoners. Met Jack Wheeler tonight. Another air raid alert. 
St.-Mihiel salient battle map
From Paris Herald, September 17, 1918         

Don Martin's daily report for Paris on September 16 was on a French political topic, recalling that politics was close to his heart. It was published in the Paris Herald on Tuesday, Sept 17. 
French Premier Gives Thanks 
to General Pershing
 (Special Telegram to the Herald)
By DON MARTIN
With The American Armies, Monday.
              M. Clemenceau visited the American Headquarters yesterday afternoon and talked with General Pershing, whom he complimented on the work done by his men. He said: “The Americans are deserving of much praise.” Afterwards the Premier visited some of the interesting points near the front.
              M. Clemenceau left Paris to visit the new Voivre front on Saturday morning. He was accompanied by M. René Renoult, president of the Army Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, and General Mordacq.

              After congratulating General Pershing and the other American generals commanding the victorious forces from the United States, M. Clemenceau made a tour of inspection through the reconquered territory, visiting Thiaucourt and Vigneulles and passing a considerable time in a front-line observation post near Hattonchatel. He also went to Saint-Mihiel, where he assured the municipal authorities of the grateful solicitude of the Government and presented congratulations to General de D---, the commander of the first metropolitan division that entered the reconquered Lorraine town.
    In its Sunday edition on September 15, 1918, the New York Herald featured the following two series of photos taken by Don Martin and mailed to New York.
   Banner headline at top of page:
DON MARTIN’S THRILLING TRIBUTE TO THE AMERICAN SOLDIER
7 Photos by DON MARTIN
No. 1—Shell-shattered buildings in Fere-en-Tardenois. The sign is German.
No. 2—A glance westward on the principal street in Vaux, which was taken by the Americans after one of the most violent bombardments of the war.
No. 3—A public market in Fere-en-Tardenois which the Germans, during their six weeks’ occupation of the city, used as a hospital. American soldiers who cleaned up the city are having their mess at noon time.
No. 4—This is a close range photograph of a shell hole made by one of the French heavy guns. The hole is about eight feet in depth and about thirty feet in diameter.
No. 5—Wrecked building in village of Essomes on the Marne. Shells fell in great numbers here.
No. 6—Here is what an aerial bomb did to a two story building in Fere-en-Tardenois.
No. 7—This picture gives a good idea of the force of a high explosive shell.


    Banner headline at top of page:
HOW A BIG BATTLE IS FOUGHT,
AS DESCRIBED BY DON MARTIN
6 Photos by Don Martin
No. 1---These two Frenchmen are moving back to their wrecked home. They left it in June and it was badly damaged by shells.
No. 2---A movement toward the front.
No. 3---A village street on the outskirts of Fere-en-Tardenois.
No, 4---An aerial bomb struck this house. On June 1 it was a fine new dwelling owned by a wealthy manufacturer of Chateau-Thierry.
No. 5---Typical grave of a German lieutenant, holder of the Iron Cross/

No. 6—In the village of Beuvardes, recaptured by the Americans and French, the French cemetery has been despoiled by the Germans. There are twenty German markers, some of which are shown in the photograph over spots where French citizens of Beuvardes, dead many years, had been buried.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...