Skip to main content

September 21, 1918: Don Martin has quiet day in Nancy

Don Martin diary entry for Saturday, September 21, 1918: 
Stayed in again. Spent most of the day in the Censor’s office. Was introduced to the French widow in black who is on her way to visit her husband’s grave in Luneville. She is a very charming woman.
       On this quiet day, Don Martin just sent his daily report for Paris with a couple news bits. It was published in the Paris Herald on Sunday, Sept 22. 
BIG-SCALE EFFORT 
TO PIERCE AMEX LINES IS FOILED
Fires Behind German Lines May Presage 
Fresh Retreat Under American Pressure
(Special Telegram to the Herald)
By Don Martin
WITH THE AMERICAN ARMIES, Saturday.
              Following a raking barrage, the Germans made two attempts last night to pierce the American lines, but they were repulsed on each occasion by artillery fire. They evidently made rather elaborate plans for the raid, for they laid down a barrage on a front of a kilomètre and a half. There was heavy artillery fire along most of the front all night, and this morning the enemy is shelling our back areas, and being shelled in turn.
              The Germans have prepared strong machine-gun defences on both sides of Haumont. During the night eight fires were seen in Dommartin. The Germans are apparently destroying barracks and hospitals, which they always destroy when they are evacuating or preparing to evacuate a region.
1920 Class a Failure?
              It is evident that the Germans have not obtained good results with the men of the 1920 class which have been used in the front line during the last few weeks. A captured document, unsigned, but presumably issued by someone in high authority, says: “Men of the 1920 class are not to be used at the front without my consent, unless they are war volunteers or aspirant officers. This consent, for the present, cannot be accorded.”

              Among the prisoners captured during the Saint-Mihiel operations are six members of the 75th Austro-Hungarian division. They say that Hungary is being used to pull the German chestnuts out of the fire, and people are beginning to realize this. They say that the people all over Hungary want peace at any price. Recently, two regiments mutinied in Budapest, and Germans and Austrians were called to establish order. One officer among the prisoners says that they fight only because they know if they did not they would be executed.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more