Skip to main content

September 10, 1918: Don Martin reports on bombing of hospital

Don Martin diary entry for Tuesday, September 10, 1918: 
Slept late today. Was awakened about eleven by Lieutenants [Arthur E.] Hartzell and Light who said to be prepared to move tomorrow morning at 10 o’clock. Packed up and wrote a few letters. Most of the correspondents are in Paris but will be back tonight. It is now assured that the Americans intend to make a big offensive around Nancy. Everyone knows about it so it presumably will be no surprise for the Boche. My idea is that there will be something new and terrible in the way of artillery and gas which will startle the Hun.
                     Don Martin's daily dispatch for Paris on September 10  reported on a relatively quiet day. It was published in the Paris Herald on Sept 11.         
Hospital Bombed By Hun Avions 
South Of Vesle
No Damage Done to Patients, But Red Cross Etched in Stone Is Destroyed
(Special Telegram to the Herald)
By DON MARTIN
With The American Armies, Tuesday.
                Again last night and to-day there was a comparative quiet along the American front north of the Vesle. From the shelling done by the Germans it would seem that they have their heavy guns in place back of the Aisne. They are keeping a moderately strong force south of the Aisne, but it is more likely that they intend to go north as soon as they are pressed.
                  That the Huns have no respect for hospitals was shown a few days ago, when they bombed a hospital not far south of the Vesle. No damage was done either to the hospital or to patients, but the huge Red Cross, which is etched with white stones beside the hospital, was struck by two bombs and wiped out.
              Airplanes were over the region in the afternoon, presumably making observations. There can be no doubt that the observers saw the sign of the cross. At night a plane swooped down to within 500 feet of the place and dropped eight bombs. The patients were removed to a place near by.

           In the Vosges the Huns attempted a big raid, but were repulsed with losses. Germans were seen going back to their lines with wounded and dead. We had no losses.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more