Skip to main content

June 1, 1918 - Don Martin tells stories from the front


Don Martin diary entry for Saturday, June 1, 1918: 
Started with [Edwin] James [New York Times] and Lieutenant Wilson for the Château-Thierry section. Went by way of Ligny, Vitry, Sezanne and Montmarail. Rode about 180 miles. Passed miles and miles of soldiers, both American and French on their way to the front to resist the onward push of the Germans. Saw the third division in line. Slept at Montmarail.
          Don Martin began to collect and tell stories of individuals on the front lines, including German prisoners and an American "Ace". These, probably written after midnight on June 1 and cabled before his lengthy tour that day, were published in the New York Herald on Sunday, June 2, 1918.
GERMANS NOW EAGER TO LEARN ALL ABOUT AMERICAN TROOPS IN FRANCE, HAVE ORDERS TO TAKE PRISONERS
Hun Deserter to the Pershing Line 
Brings Interesting Information
MORALE IS GOOD, BUT MEN NOT SO STURDY
Douglas Campbell, American Ace, 
Defeats Hun Flyer in Full View of Lines
By DON MARTIN
[Special cable to the Herald]
WITH THE AMERICAN ARMY IN FRANCE, Saturday
             From a German who deserted to the American lines interesting information has been gathered. The German army now has three meatless days a week. This has caused dissatisfaction, but is accepted as necessary. The soldiers manage to spread their allowance so as to get some each day of the week but one.
           The new troops show great eagerness to learn the movements of the Americans. The recent raid, with a result so costly to the Germans in the Luneville sector, was undertaken on orders to get American prisoners at any cost. They got none.
           The prisoner who deserted says the morale of the Germans is good, but the sturdiness of the troops is below their former standard.
Tried Twice to Desert
           The story of the prisoner’s entry into the American lines is remarkable. He left once to cross “No Man’s Land,“ but got lost in the mist and wandered back to his own lines. Next time, just before dawn, he crossed “No Man’s Land” and came on an American officer and five soldiers. He saw them first through the mist. Then the Americans saw him and watched.
           There was a smile on the face of the prisoner, who spoke English and said, “Good morning.” The Americans gave him a cigarette and talked. The prisoner was a merchant in peace times, but was forced into service. He was friendly to America from the start. He says a good many would desert if they got a good chance. It was more dangerous to desert than to fight.
           A first line American soldier got lost in “No Man’s Land” and wandered in the midst of the German lines, but returned safely, throwing a grenade at a sentry on his way back.
Campbell Downs Hun Flyer
           America now has an All-American ace. He is Douglass Campbell, of California. In a thrilling battle yesterday in a biplane at a height of 4,000 metres he brought down a German who landed inside our lines. The observer had an Albatross protector after a German biplane observing our lines. Campbell chose the biplane which was armed and his companion picked the monoplane escort.
           The fight between Campbell and the biplane was in full view of the men in our line. Campbell somersaulted, flew upside down, then rose a thousand metres and plunged within a hundred yards of the enemy. The German sought to escape, but Campbell maneuvered and forced the Boche over our line, then flew behind him and riddled his machine with bullets. Afterward Campbell flew back to the hangar and received the congratulations of other flyers, who tipped their hats to Campbell. He is modest and is the pride of the whole flying outfit.
           There are two other American aces, also Captain Peterson, but they flew with the French and trained here. Campbell got his full training in America. Campbell now has five machines officially to his credit, making him an ace. Really he has brought down six.
Lt. Douglas Campbell 
National Archives photo No. 11-SC-11308

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...