Skip to main content

Don Martin, Soldier of the Pen – Introduction

This daily blog has the ambition to bring back to life WWI war correspondent Don Martin, and to make a contribution to the history of American journalism as a contribution to the centennial celebration of the Great War. It is written for the one-hundredth anniversary of Don Martin's death and the end of the Great War, World War I. 
The Great War, which began in August 1914, finally ended in November 1918, just a month after Don Martin’s death from Spanish influenza in France. Much has been written about World War I and the eventual important involvement of the United States. The American public did not go joyfully into this far-off conflict. There was strong opposition to sending an army, and President Woodrow Wilson’s narrow reelection victory in 1916 was helped by the slogan “He kept us out of the war.” When Wilson changed his mind in 1917, the United States Committee on Public Education was set up to engage Americans in supporting the war. It carried out a successful campaign to get Americans to support sending their sons to fight, to provide financing through Liberty Bonds, and to produce an immense amount of munitions, military equipment, clothing and food. 
From the beginning of American involvement with the Great War, control and later censorship of the press was enforced by the American government, initially in line with America’s declared “neutrality”. Reports from the war front by American war correspondents were problematic. Eminent American war correspondent Richard Harding Davis, who had covered many wars including the Spanish American and Boer War in South Africa for the New York Herald, went over when the Germans invaded Belgium in 1914 for the New York Tribune. Upon observing the German takeover of Brussels and Louvain, he found he could not give a “neutral” report on what he saw happening, and his editors declined to print his dispatches because they ran counter to America’s “neutrality.” Davis returned to the U.S. and wrote a best seller about his WWI experiences. He suffered a heart attack and died in April 1916. 
In 1914, the leaders of the allied governments took actions to stop and prevent reporting. British Lord Kitchener, Secretary of State for War, had reporters banned from the Front at the start of the war. A few reporters lived as fugitives near the Front, sending back their reports. Eventually, the British Government in April 1915 accredited selected war correspondents, but kept them under rigid censorship. In America the Woodrow Wilson administration at first attempted to censor not only newspaper accounts of the war but books and magazines. This caused a strong reaction by the press in the effort to gain journalistic freedom. Walter Lippmann, a highly respected journalist and commentator, warned at the time that manipulation of the press through government's "public relations" was highly dangerous.
  However, by 1918 the situation was different. Dr. Margaret Spratt, reviewing Chris Dubbs' book American Journalists in the Great War (Roads to the Great War, Nov 7, 2017), wrote: By the time the U.S. entered the war in 1917, attitudes about the usefulness of the war correspondent had evolved. Rather than viewing them, at best, as nuisances, and at worst, as unwitting spies, the military embraced the significance of accurate and sympathetic reporting. As General Pershing noted, "In this war, I consider a trained newspaperman worth a regiment of cavalry" (p. 203).

    War correspondents became fully integrated into the military system as mouthpieces for the 'official' version of events The U.S. military welcomed and accommodated representatives from American newspapers and organizations near the front – but under strict control and censorship rules.  The major news organizations competed to provide the best coverage of the war, sending their best reporters to serve as ‘war correspondents’. James Gordon Bennett,Jr., owner of the New York Herald, selected his top political journalist, Don Martin, to cover the American Expeditionary Forces in France.

Comments

  1. This is extremely useful background information. It gives us a great way to appreciate the new opportunities and enduring constraints under which Don Martin did his work. I'm looking forward to seeing how Martin negotiates this journalistic and humanitarian challenge.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.

U.S. Sanctions, Middle East views

Trump’s special envoy Witkoff has hit the capitals again; in Tel Aviv Netanyahu probably told him to tell Trump that he will take over all of Gaza; in Moscow Putin probably told him to tell Trump that Ukraine will be destroyed and forget the sanctions. Witkoff didn’t get to number 3 on his list, Iran. But Trump played another ‘ getting to a deal ’ with Iran card, adding sanctions he can later get credit for removing. And the Middle East commentators are worriedly reacting to the Iran situation. Here are some highlights.  From Newsweek:       The U.S. announced on July 30 the largest Iran-related sanctions since 2018 , targeting entities and vessels linked to the country's petroleum sector: 20 oil firms, 5 vessel management companies, 1 wholesaler, and over 115 individuals in 17 countries and regions, including the U.K., Italy, Switzerland, India, the UAE and Hong Kong.       U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said: "Today's Depar...

“Quit the nuclear deal”

The E3 (Britan, France, Germany) upped their ante with a letter to the UN Security Council on August 12, 2025, that included: ‘ if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism ’. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  So far, we have an Iranian response from Parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki — who was Iran’s top diplomat for five years in the 2000s — saying the Iranian parliament has a “ finger on the trigger ” for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. “ We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal, ” if the E3 raises the issue at the U.N. Security Council, Mottaki said. (AP, Aug 13, 2025)  On ‘extension’, following July’s meeting in Istanbul [between E3 and Iran], an E3 diplomat said Iran could delay [snapback] by doing two things [1] renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and [2] addressing concerns about its highly enriche...