Skip to main content

Don Martin going to Europe? August-October 1917

     For Don Martin, there was a start-stop story of leaving for Europe that was nerve-racking and seemingly never-ending. He wrote a lot about it in his 1917 Diary, with the first mention on August 26, 1917, at the time he was getting engaged in overseeing the Herald’s electoral poll for the 1917 mayoralty race in New York City. By mid-October it seemed pretty certain that he would go to Europe after the November election.
Don Martin diary entries
Sunday, August 26, 1917: Took 4:51 train from Albany to N.Y. On way in office met Ohl, Editor-in-Chief, who wanted to know if I would consent to go to London as chief correspondent there. Told him I would if the office would take care of all my financial obligations and gives me enough to live well on in London. Ohl said he would cable Bennett in Paris. I doubt if the old man will be willing to give me enough to make the place possible. I should be glad to go.
Thursday. August 30, 1917: Guess nothing will come of the London offer. Saw Ohl at dinner and he didn’t mention it. I didn’t either. Not so anxious to be separated from [my daughter] Dorothy. Furthermore Herald probably wouldn’t pay what I demand. 
Sunday, September 2, 1917: Week has passed and I have heard nothing about the London offer. Guess nothing will come of it. Don’t suppose Bennett wants to spend as much as I insist on having.
Sunday, October 7, 1917: Ohl got cable from Bennett asking when I could go to London. They want me to go but the office wants me here until after the [November] election. I just [as] soon go to London if the office will send $40 to $50 a week home and give me enough to live on in addition. I can’t save anything anyhow so maybe this would be a good arrangement. 
Tuesday, October 9. 1917: Ohl said Bennett cabled for me to stay here till after election. From this the office infers I am to go to London right after election. I am willing. Hate to be separated in that way from Dorothy. However, I probably won’t be away a great while, if, in fact, at all.
Daley says he doesn’t like the London business because he wants me here. However, he says, if Bennett will send me to the front, it will be worthwhile for me and Herald both.
And here I am! With a possible chance to be a war correspondent and have an experience as a newspaperman abroad! Once, such a thing would have caused great excitement in me but now not much. I haven’t lost my romantic interest but I don’t exactly care so much about going so far away from Dorothy.

Sunday, October 14, 1917:  Had quite a talk with George Cooper. He says Commodore Bennett has his mind made up for me to go to Europe, but that he wants me to finish up the Mayoralty campaign. However I shan’t say anything about it till I get definitive word. Don’t imagine Dorothy will like it but she is a philosopher. I won’t go unless I can spend a week or so with her first.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more