Skip to main content

Don Martin at the New York Herald

Don Martin joined The New York Herald in 1904 as a reporter, serving for a time as city editor, but devoting himself chiefly to the political field. He served as Albany correspondent during the sessions of the Legislature, and he built up a wide circle of acquaintances with public men in Albany and in New York City. Associates in discussing his work declared that Don Martin probably was without a peer in sizing up a political situation for making a forecast, and it was as an expert on politics that he achieved his main reputation.
Don Martin at work
at the New York Herald    
From 1912 he was in charge of the political department of The Herald. In 1912 and 1916 he was in charge of the reporting on the Republican and Democratic conventions at Chicago, Baltimore and St. Louis.
He was in charge of the political straw vote of the Herald for ten years and his success attracted wide attention.  One of his greatest personal triumphs was in the tightly contested presidential election of 1916, when he correctly predicted the re-election of President Wilson over Governor Hughes based on the HERALD’s straw vote, which he personally conducted.

In his personal life he was a man of unusual charm, his natural magnetism bringing to his circle of friends men in all walks of life. He knew and was known to bankers, business men, politicians, national and State legislators, Governors, Presidents, men high in statecraft – in fact, included in the intimacy of his life were almost all of the men of all political parties who lived at that time and had done the big things in this country.
Don Martin numbered among his friends such men as Theodore Roosevelt, William H. Taft, President Wilson and Charles E. Hughes. In October 1916, when Mr. Hughes was travelling through the country in his campaign for the Presidency, his train stopped for a few minutes at Silver Creek, N. Y. Recalling that this was the birthplace of Don Martin, Hughes paid this remarkable tribute to him:  “I am glad to have come to Silver Creek and greet you because of the many pleasant recollections and for another reason. An honest newspaper man is the holiest work of God. And this is Don Martin’s home. I have a great regard for Don Martin and am glad to come to his home town.”
    Don Martin had a genius for friendship. From the cub reporter, whom he was never too busy to help, to Presidents of the United States, all who knew him had a genuine affection for him. When he was about to start for France, Charles E. Hughes, who had formed an attachment for him when he was Governor of New York, gave up an important engagement in order to preside at the dinner that the staff of the New York HERALD gave at the time of his departure, and to present a watch to the departing correspondent on behalf of the members of the New York Herald staff. President Wilson sent Don Martin a personal letter on his coming to Europe.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more