Skip to main content

August 23, 1918: Don Martin reports on German prisoners and downed French Ace

Don Martin diary entry for Friday, August 23, 1918: 
Started out at 10 a.m. despite the heat. Motored to Fresnes, the 3rd corps headquarters. Learned the Americans had recovered slight ground lost yesterday. Visited a hospital where I saw many serious cases of Americans wounded. All smile and want to get well so they can go back to the line. Am all packed up ready to move to Nancy or Neufchateau. Everyone seems to know that the Americans intend to make an offensive on the front nearest Metz so I suppose the plan will be changed. French and English continue to harass the Germans. Yesterday got a letter from Ohl [New York Herald Manager]. He seems very friendly but did not say whether he is pleased or dissatisfied with my work. I am quite sure he is satisfied. Cabled 600 words.
      In his August 23 daily dispatch for Paris, Don Martin again reported on German prisoners. It was published in the Paris Herald on August 24.
YANKS TAKE BOCHES WHO TALK 
LIKE HUN COMMUNIQUES
Artillery Fire and Infantry Action Continue in American-Held Vesle Sector
(Special Telegram to the Herald)
By DON MARTIN
With the American Armies, Friday
           Along the Vesle front held by the Americans there was continuous artillery fire and considerable infantry activity last night and this morning. The Americans attacked the Germans at the point where on Thursday the enemy was most active, and drove them back a short distance, capturing four prisoners. They were all members of a well-known German unit, and in their general attitude toward the war, furnished a contrast to other German prisoners of inferior intelligence and experience. The men brought in yesterday claimed they are not discouraged by the recent withdrawal from the Marne salient, nor by the withdrawal at other points under pressure from the French and British. In a way which seemed to carry more boastfulness than confidence, they declared that the German High Command merely desires to straighten out the line and prepare for operations on a large scale.
           In the vicinity of the Château-le-Diable and the Bois-le-Diable there was much fighting all of Thursday night and this morning. The Germans are sniping with machine-guns, the Americans retort with automatics. The fighting at this point, while not of large proportions nor of importance in comparison with the fighting which the Americans engaged in a short time ago, is nevertheless frequently bitter and savage. The Germans seem determined to hold the plateaus there and four kilomètres back from the north bank of the Vesle, but as the pressure from the west increases and the heat of the American and French artillery fire from the south becomes intensified, it is likely that the Boche will fold up his tent and steal away—if he is able to do so. His next stopping place will probably be the heights north of the Aisne.
        Also on August 23, Don Martin reported for Paris on the death in action on August 21 of a popular French Ace, with American family connections. It was published in the Paris Herald on August 24.
Popular Aviator Killed in Action
(Special Telegram to the Herald)
By DON MARTIN
With the American Armies, Friday
           Lieutenant Louis Verdier, a well-known “pilote de chasse,” credited with five German machines and formerly chief of the Lafayette Squadron, has been killed in action. Lieutenant Verdier was popular with all his associates. He was a close companion of the famed Nungesser, also an intimate fried of Major Thaw and the late Major Lufbery.
                   He was a brother of Lieutenant Paul Verdier, in civil life manager of the City of Paris Restaurant in San Francisco, but now in the United States on a special Government mission. Both men are brothers-in-law of Lieutenant Francis de Tessen, an aide to Marshal Joffre during his visit to the United States and now a liaison officer on the American front.

      The life and exploits of Louis Verdier-Fauvety are described in “The Lafayette Flying Corps – Volume 1”, from which these photos are taken.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more