Skip to main content

August 15, 1918: Don Martin's day trip to a 'quiet' front

Don Martin diary entry for Thursday, August 15, 1918: 
Went out with [Edwin] James [New York Times]. Visited the 1st corps headquarters at Coulange; got no luncheon and came back by a road south of the Marne. Wrote about 500 word cable for New York. Correspondents now told they must keep writing from here so the Germans will not suspect that we are liable to break out somewhere else. We are to stay here for ten days and then go to Nancy. Word came this afternoon for the correspondents to go to Chaumont tomorrow to attend an important conference at G.H.Q. General Pershing wants to talk to us.
           Don Martin wrote a short report for Paris on his day trip to the front, dated Thursday, August 15,which was published in the Paris Herald on Friday, August 16.
German Bombing Planes 
Fly Over American Centres
Drop Explosives Where They Think Troops Are Quartered – Vesle Positions Strengthened
(Special Telegram to the Paris Herald)
By Don Martin
With The American Armies, Thursday.
             During the last few nights Germans have been attempting to do with bombing planes what they ordinarily do with their heavy artillery. More than a dozen large bombers flew over the American back areas last night and the night before and dropped aerial torpedoes where they supposed troops were quartered. The performance began about ten o’clock on Tuesday night and continued until daylight. Last night there were fewer enemy planes about.
                 There has been practically no infantry action along that part of the Vesle, which has been the scene of keenest American activity. The Germans have, as I stated several days ago, strengthened their positions on the heights north of Vesle and are determined to hold there for a while – presumably until they have perfected a position farther north. Their artillery has been comparatively quiet.
               In the village of Fismette, opposite Fismes, there has been a good deal of sniping and machine-gun firing. The Germans are in one end of the village, the Americans in the other. The result is that the four or five principal streets are swept with machine-gun fire whenever soldiers are seen, and snipers are taking pot shots at every soldier who is foolish enough to stand still for more than a second.
                Fismette has been a lively place for several days and artillery has left it alone because of the presence of both Germans and Americans.

                To-day I took a trip practically up to the eminence overlooking Fismes. Everywhere I found that the Germans left behind millions of dollars’ worth of supplies and ammunition and that they unquestionably intended to remain south of the Vesle until the end of the war.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more