Skip to main content

Headlines tell a story

So much “news” has come out on the first day of Trump’s so-called ‘Project Freedom’. It is not possible to know what is real and what is ‘fake’, who is exaggerating and how much. Here is the story that the headlines of the continuing postings by Iran International tell. Most important is the last one: expect Israel to restart massive bombing of Iran within 24 hours. Netanyahu and cohorts get their way: up the escalation ladder Trump will go! 

• Iran says Fujairah attack a response to US 'adventurism' - state media 
• Iran threatens UAE with sweeping strikes if it makes any 'unwise' move 
• Iran military official denies US Navy report of boats sunk - state TV 
• Iran says no vessels passed Hormuz, rejects US military's claim 
• Iran fired warning shot at US warship in Hormuz - Reuters 
• IRGC chief says unauthorized Hormuz vessels are ‘legitimate targets’ 
• IRGC says Hormuz rules unchanged, warns non-compliant ships 
• IRGC media - Iran ready for any Hormuz scenario 
 
• UAE official tells Israel it will strike back at Iran - Channel 12 
• UAE says it intercepted 19 missiles and drones launched from Iran 
• UAE reports fire at Fujairah facility after Iran drone strike 
• Oman says residential building hit in attack, two foreigners injured 
 
• Iran faces deal-or-bomb deadline from Trump - Axios 
• Trump says Iran would be ‘blown off the earth’ if US ships hit - Fox News 
• [Treasury Sec] Bessent says US has 'absolute control' of Strait of Hormuz 
• [UN Ambassador] Waltz - US to draft UN resolution on Hormuz with allies 
• CENTCOM chief says more ships en route through Hormuz- Newsmax 
• CENTCOM says no US Navy ship hit by Iran missiles 
• US forces authorized to strike threats near Hormuz - Axios 

 • US, Israeli strikes on Iran expected within 24 hours - CNN

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more