Skip to main content

October 3, 1918: Don Martin, sick, returns to Paris

      On Thursday, October 3, Don Martin was on his way to Paris, a very sick man.
        Somehow he wrote his daily dispatch for Paris on October 3, perhaps while in transit to Paris. It was published in the Paris Herald on Friday, October 6.  
Germans Attack Americans 
After Crying ‘Kamerad!’
(Special Telegram to the Herald)
By DON MARTIN
 WITH THE AMERICAN ARMIES, Thursday
                       Scores of instances of alleged German atrocities on the field of battle are heard but it is seldom that one is printed because the United States authorities have ruled that no atrocity story may be published until it is verified. Here is one which has been verified.
                       During the fighting in the Argonne forest the Americans attacked the abri of St. Louis, one of the strongest local entrenchments in the forest. The Germans waited till the Americans were about 100 feet from the abri and then one hundred of them came out and offered to surrender. They threw up their hands and the Americans accepted their plea, and as the Germans advanced the Americans paid little attention to them. Presently the Huns put down their hands and hurled a deluge of hand-grenades on the Americans, inflicting severe casualties. The Americans thereupon attacked the Germans still resisting in the abri.

                       The Germans shelled many points along the American front last night and early to-day. The shelling reached proportions of a barrage at five o’clock this morning and the American reply was very intense. Patrols were active along the entire front. A Boche observation plane tried to take photographs over the line this morning. The Americans attacked and forced the Huns to land, the observer and pilot were unhurt and were made prisoners.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

‘New war with Israel at any moment’, ‘still digging through rubble’

The news about Iran has taken an ominous tone in the last couple days. Here is some reporting and commentary.  Newsweek on August 18, 2025, reported that Yahya Rahim Safavi, senior military adviser to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said ‘ We are not in a ceasefire; we are in a stage of war. No protocol, regulation, or agreement has been written between us and the U.S. or Israel. A new war with Israel could break out at any moment .’  Yonah Jeremy Bob commented in The Jerusalem Post on August 19, 2025, that ‘ Khamenei can either “drink from the poisoned chalice” of diplomatic concessions … or face more airstrikes, possibly next time some targeting him directly ’.   Bob also noted that ‘ right now Iran is still digging through rubbl e’. The U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan on June 22. Two months of digging. No surprise that there has been no public news about that.
Post a Comment
Read more

Assessing possible outcomes of the snapback mechanism

The initiation by the E3 of the 30-day snapback mechanism in the UN Security Council makes everything more difficult and there is great uncertainty about the outcome. Will it be peaceful with a new nuclear deal with Iran, negotiated by the U.S., endorsed by the UNSC and verified by IAEA, or will Iran withdraw from NPT with further military action by Israel and the U.S.?                 To perhaps shed a little light on what the outcome will be, here is my analysis of how the players - Iran, U.S. and E3 - may be assessing the acceptability of the range of outcomes. Four levels of acceptability were used: 1 Fully acceptable; 2 Less acceptable; 3 Just acceptable; and 4 Not acceptable. Four near term 30-day outcomes are listed, and two optimistic outcomes with an interim U.S.-Iran agreement reached within a 6-month extension.                 For the 30-day near term, the best outcome would b...
Post a Comment
Read more

‘Making nuclear fuel’ under the NPT

It is with some hesitation that I take issue with the latest publication of the renowned Henry Sokolski and Sharon Squassoni on August 15 in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, titled: “ Actually, the NPT doesn’t guarantee a right to make nuclear fuel .”  But someone should defend the IAEA and international safeguards! Here are points in question.            ‘ The [NPT] treaty was designed to prevent dangerous bombmaking activitie s.’  NPT is far more complex than that. It is common to state the three pillars of NPT: nuclear disarmament; nuclear nonproliferation; and peaceful uses of nuclear technology. Nonproliferation involves the commitment of non-nuclear states not to pursue nuclear weapons and to accept IAEA inspection to confirm that commitment is being followed. Perhaps Sokolsky intends to refer to INFCIRC/153, which lays out how IAEA and the state cooperate to carry out that confirmation. If so, INFCIRC/153 is not designed to ‘prevent’...
Post a Comment
Read more